Defect in Form: Evils of Tight Lacing (a.k.a. Corsets), 1897
Defect in Form: Evils of Tight Lacing (a.k.a. Corsets), 1897
.
.
My recent post about corsets contained a syndicated article from New York Times, published in Kansas Farmer of Topeka, Kansas, on May 5, 1880:
.
The author, an eminent physician from London, England, explained why corsets were so damaging to a woman’s health. Specifically, he argued, to her brain-power. Dr. Richardson was far from the only authority who spoke loudly against the tight lacing of corsets–and corsets at all. I’ve read citations from other men in the late 19th century condemning the wearing of corsets, who admitted they could not persuade their own wives and daughters to forego the dangerous practice. Fashion had that tight of a hold over the women.
Nineteenth Century fashions, focused on how tiny the waist could be made (and made to appear), required tight lacing to gain the effects so eagerly sought.
.
.
FASHION
.
Can you imagine?
.
Just how much pressure would have to be exerted upon a young girl’s ribs to force them to change their natural shape… and then to remain so constricted?
.
.
.
ADVERTISEMENTS
.
Throughout time, advertisements have always argued their side of the story… even when it’s largely lacking in scientific basis (or truth). Maternity Corset advertisements argued that such a contraption was necessary for a healthy baby and safe pregnancy. Most women wanted a healthy child and good outcome, so they continued to wear what their mother’s insisted upon: laces (corsets).
Dr. Warner’s Health Corset (with just what every woman needs:) skirt supporter and self-adjusting pads to secure health and comfort of body, with grace and beauty of form. All highly desirable outcomes. Even better– Three garments in one. (See the supporters referenced–skirt supporters distributed the weight of a woman’s skirt containing many yards of fabric to the shoulders, and many women also padded their bust and/or hips to greater achieve an hourglass figure.)
.
.
Ball’s Health Preserving Corsets, made/distributed by Chicago Corset Company, states in their newspaper advertisements, in the product’s name, that their corset preserves health. Who doesn’t want their health to last?
.
.
.
BUT SCIENCE SAYS…
.
.
.
AND DRESS REFORMERS…
.
~ Dress-Reform: A Series of Lectures Delivered in Boston, on Dress as it Affects the Health of Women. Edited by Abba Goold Woolson. With Illustrations. Boston: Roberts Brothers, 1874
.
.
ONE MORE VOICE OF REASON
.
The following article, published in Chicago Daily Tribune of Chicago, Illinois, on April 24, 1897:
.
.
.
Related Articles
.
Defect in Form: Evils of Tight Lacing (a.k.a. Corsets), 1897
Updated August 2020
Copyright © 2017 Kristin Holt LC
Defect in Form: Evils of Tight Lacing (a.k.a. Corsets), 1897
Thank you, Kristin, for another wonderfully informative article. I can’t imagine wearing anything that constrictive for a moment or two much less an entire day. It’s amazing what women do for beauty or for what they think men want. When my characters remove their corsets and take that first full breath, I will feel their relief.
Hi Marianne–
What an insightful response…for your characters to draw a full breath with relief when the corset is finally removed. Ahhh! I’m so glad to be a 21st Century woman, through and through, though I do love learning about the 19th. Sounds like you and I have that in common.
Happy writing!
Kristin
The point of a corset isn’t to constrict the waist. It’s to provide the shape that fashion demands, and most of that is with padding and other such things. A properly worn corset is like a brassiere, meant to support the bust. The point is not to deform. The point is to support, just as a brassiere does.
Hi Emilie–
Very well said.
Corsets, today, can be an ideal foundation garment. Like any other item of clothing, corsets can fit well or they can be a disaster…
Isn’t it interesting that this 1897 article (and the widespread concern in dress reform at that time) found too many laced past the point of good sense? (All in the name of fashion?)
Thanks for stopping by and commenting!
Warm regards,
Kristin Holt